According to Mc Rae, representational material is a powerful tool for students learning process. It transcends the objective of the language curriculum. We want our students to comprehend meanings of the language but small "l" goes beyond that. Students receive longer-term benefit from discussions of representational materials.

Comprehension is said to be a beginning, not an ending to small "l" exploration. Students are taught to get in touch with their emotion as well as their imagination. TVs and computers have done a lot of thinking on our behalf in our daily life. Many of us have become "brain dead" individuals who lack the capacity to process information without spoon feeding from the machines surrounding us.
To challenge this phenomena, representational material plays an important role. It becomes a basis for training students to develop their linguistic ability that is derived from their own ideas and thought process. Their mind is trained to busy itself with activities that has been much in the past suppressed or laid dormant. Students would have to deal with activities such as reflection, developing insights, and constructing personal interpretation of small "l" materials.
To do this, teachers need to find text that is interesting, rewarding, stimulating and contains teachable qualities that allows the text to "speak for itself". It should be intrinsically rewarding so as to break the walls of inhibition among students, thus inviting participation and sincere involvement from students.
Literature? Scary and intimidating word. Honestly speaking, many of us think that literature is for the gifted. Some people are born for literature and some are not, just like talents for numbers. Mc Rae asserts that this is the typical excuse for not bringing literature into the classroom. We put limitations on ourselves. Anybody, he says, could teach and learn literature. Especially the small "l".

True to some extent, yet the opposite view still rules in practice. Somehow, it seems that literature talent lies with the right brain persona, the more intuitive individuals. They are emotionally rich and articulate their thoughts and feelings fluently. The rest of us use language mainly as a basic function, that is to convey messages and put meanings across.
To employ literature in the classroom is to expand this basic communication into more complex activities. Language is used not just to deliver important messages but also to express viewpoints, thoughts, insights and our own personal revelation. It demands courage to expose our inner turmoils. It demands us to unravel the ideas inside us and put them into coherent thoughts to be expressed to others. It demands us to share our understanding of our surrounding.
This openness and sharing may subject us to personal attack. This becomes another fear of teachers teaching literature. Some people are not prepared to reveal themselves in the sharing component of literature discussion. Some may value their internal privacy and try to preserve this private space as much as possible.
It can be argued that literature is reserved for those who are talented in the field. The resistance is not simply due to misunderstanding of the correct approach but could be because of some people lack the artistic capacity to express themselves unlike others. It is for the same reason why you can't force some people to love math.
|
|